DU Urges Sonam Wangchuk to End Fast Over NEET-UG Protests

Delhi University has formally appealed to climate activist Sonam Wangchuk to conclude his ongoing hunger strike. This intervention comes as Wangchuk expresses solidarity with students protesting the alleged NEET-UG 2026 paper leak.

The protests primarily demand the resignation of Union Education Minister **Dharmendra Pradhan**, whom demonstrators hold accountable for systemic examination failures. Wangchuk’s fast highlights the significant impact of these issues on medical entrance examinations.

Government Response and University Stance

The university’s appeal follows the central government’s recent announcement to establish fast-track courts. These courts are specifically dedicated to addressing cases involving paper leaks, aiming to expedite legal proceedings.

Delhi University stated its intention to promote harmony within the academic sphere. Its stance aligns with this government initiative, indicating support for measures to penalize those involved in examination irregularities.

Academic Community’s Internal Debate

This public intervention by the university has generated considerable debate within the academic community. Some faculty members have questioned the appropriateness of educational institutions endorsing political actions, especially when students seek accountability for an examination crisis.

Further controversy emerged from social media posts by official accounts of certain college principals expressing support for Minister Pradhan. This disparity has led to internal discussions among teaching staff regarding the neutrality of public universities.

For instance, **Rajdhani College** retracted a post and issued an apology after facing criticism. In contrast, a similar statement from the principal of **Shaheed Bhagat Singh College** remains active, sparking further debate.

The situation remains dynamic as various stakeholders deliberate on the balance between institutional communication and their obligations to students. Persistent issues surrounding exam integrity continue to be a central concern.