⚖

Compare Funds

See how two funds stack up side by side, real returns, risk, cost and portfolio overlap.

IN
ING MFING Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund - BonusHybrid - Balanced Hybrid Fund
₹10.23 as on 29 Oct 2009
VS
QS
QSIFQsif Hybrid Long-Short Fund - Regular Plan - IDCWRegular · IDCW
₹12.61 as on 30 Oct 2026
▤Key Metrics Comparison
MetricINING Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund - BonusQSQsif Hybrid Long-Short Fund - Regular Plan - IDCW
Snapshot
AMCING MFQSIF
CategoryHybrid - Balanced Hybrid FundHybrid - Long-Short Fund
NAV₹10.23 (29 Oct 2009)₹12.61 (30 Oct 2026)
Rating★★★★★★
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive IndexNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 50:50 Index
Fund ManagerManish BhandariSandeep Tandon
Inception—15 Oct 2025
Returns
1Y—26.41%
3Y——
5Y——
Since Inception—26.03%
Risk
—19.65
—-0.48
—2.24
—39.13
—8.37
—-2.41%
Costs
Expense Ratio1.00%3.66%
Exit LoadNil3% on or before 30D, NIL after 30D
Min SIP—₹1,000
Min Lumpsum₹5,000₹10,00,000
Lock-inNoneNone

Min SIP is reported per fund, not per plan, every plan of a fund shares the same figure.

◐Portfolio Overlap
ING MF100%
QSIF100%
0.0%

Only 0.0% of holdings by weight are common between ING MF and QSIF, based on each fund's top 20 disclosed holdings, not the full portfolio.

Category context: Hybrid vs Hybrid. Open the full Screener →