⚖
Compare Funds
See how two funds stack up side by side, real returns, risk, cost and portfolio overlap.
VS
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Growth - Direct Plan | Qsif Hybrid Long-Short Fund - Regular Plan - IDCW |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| AMC | Edelweiss MF | QSIF |
| Category | Hybrid - Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Hybrid - Long-Short Fund |
| NAV | ₹73.75 (29 Oct 2026) | ₹12.61 (30 Oct 2026) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★ |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 50:50 Index |
| Fund Manager | Bhavesh Jain | Sandeep Tandon |
| Inception | 07 Jan 2013 | 15 Oct 2025 |
| Returns | ||
| 1Y | -2.40% | 26.41% |
| 3Y | 12.79% | — |
| 5Y | 12.63% | — |
| Since Inception | 13.47% | 26.03% |
| Risk | ||
| 10.26 | 19.65 | |
| 1.10 | -0.48 | |
| 0.57 | 2.24 | |
| 3.53 | 39.13 | |
| 1.09 | 8.37 | |
| -8.77% | -2.41% | |
| Costs | ||
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 3.66% |
| Exit Load | Nil upto 10% of units and 1% for remaining units on or before 90D, Nil after 90D | 3% on or before 30D, NIL after 30D |
| Min SIP | ₹100 | ₹1,000 |
| Min Lumpsum | ₹100 | ₹10,00,000 |
| Lock-in | None | None |
Min SIP is reported per fund, not per plan, every plan of a fund shares the same figure.
Portfolio Overlap
Edelweiss MF100%
QSIF100%
0.0%Only 0.0% of holdings by weight are common between Edelweiss MF and QSIF, based on each fund's top 20 disclosed holdings, not the full portfolio.
Category context: Hybrid vs Hybrid. Open the full Screener →